Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin O'Connell (Canadian weather reporter)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 14:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Kevin O'Connell (Canadian weather reporter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the general notability guideline and the notability guidelines for journalists. No apparent coverage outside of stories on the affiliated Global Edmonton website. schetm (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:48, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Single-market local television personalities are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — they can get articles if they can be shown to clear WP:GNG on the basis of sufficient reliable source coverage about them in unaffiliated media, but they do not get to keep articles whose only source is their staff profile on the website of their own employer. Bearcat (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable journalist; no indication of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable weather reporter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.