Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Mediacracy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 13:09, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- New Mediacracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article of a podcast created by one it's hosts Chris McCaleb - Cmccaleb (talk · contribs) with no coverage. Sources include 1. spidvid, a websites blog. 2. Hollywood Reporter half a sentence mention. 3 and 4 are tech blogs, and 5 is its own website. Does not meet WP:GNG. Delete. Otterathome (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:N due to lack of coverage by Independent Reliable Sources. The only real source listed at the article gives this subject only a passing mention. In a search I found nothing to add.--MelanieN (talk) 02:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Biblioworm 04:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 19:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 19:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. No references, and none to be found. Lovely article, but given the preponderance of SPAs I'm guessing WP:PROMO. LaMona (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.